The Institute for Global Engagement
Connect with us: Visit us on facebook Visit us on twitter
  • About the Institute
    • Mission and History
    • Structure
    • What People Are Saying
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Board of Advisors
    • Board of Directors
    • Staff
    • Partners
    • Multimedia
    • Support IGE
    • Contact Us
  • Country Programs
    • About
    • Laos
    • Vietnam
    • Pakistan
  • Research Programs
    • About
    • The Review of Faith & International Affairs
    • Think Links
    • CFIA Research Projects
    • Books & Monographs
    • Briefs & Reports
    • Recommended Reading
    • Syllabi
  • Education Programs
    • About
    • The School for Global Engagement
    • The Global Leadership Forum
    • Global Christian
    • Internships
    • Graduate Fellowships
    • Future Programs
  • Pressroom
    • Press Releases
    • IGE in the News
    • From the President
    • Events
    • Newsletter
    • Experts Panel
  • Issues
    • News Updates
    • Congressional Testimonies
    • Articles
    • Prayer Focus
  • Gallery
  • Support IGE
    • Donate
    • Opportunities
  • Pressroom
    • Press Releases
    • IGE in the News
    • From the President
    • Events
      • Past Events
    • Newsletter
      • Newsletter Archives
    • Experts Panel
Donate Now Watch Now
The Institute for Global Engagement
I respect IGE tremendously for its quiet, nuanced approach.
Madeleine Albright
Former U.S. Secretary of State
Home » Pressroom » From the President » Religious Freedom in American Identity and Foreign Policy

Religious Freedom in American Identity and Foreign Policy

Print

By Dr. Chris Seiple on 28 January 2011

Responding to Chinese President Hu Jintao's recent visit, Chris Seiple remarks in the Washington Post on the inherent role of religious freedom in America's identity and, hence, its foreign policy. Seiple argues that American foreign policy is not American if religious freedom is not a priority. Religious freedom is not merely a geo-political issue, nor is it Republican or Democrat: it is foremost a function of who Americans are as a people.

Seiple proposes a four-pronged approach to a government-led, intentionally institutionalized conversation on the protection of freedoms. This approach would include a habitual bilateral dialogue, an ongoing attempt to discern common cultural principles, the occasional inclusion of non-state actors, and roadmap agreements. He points to the need for trained U.S. government personnel who can relate religious freedom and human rights to national security issues and economic issues. He highlights in particular the immediate need for the Obama administration to fill the position of Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom. This appointment would signal America's seriousness on this issue to the world.

Last updated 31 January 2011

Email List

Subscribe to our email newsletter to keep up to date with IGE's activities.

Related Items

  • Chris Seiple to Participate in "Global Town Hall" and Speak at the Wilson Center
  • IGE Co-Sponsors Event on Capitol Hill, Raises Profile of International Religious Freedom
  • The Politics of Evangelicalism: How Washington is Leaving the Faithful Behind
  • Don’t Miss “Religion and American Exceptionalism” — Subscribe Today
  • IGE to Co-Sponsor an IRF Event on Capitol Hill

From the President

  • Clearly Clouded: The Persian Predicament
  • The Politics of Evangelicalism: How Washington is Leaving the Faithful Behind
  • Bring It

Prayer Focus

  • Re-registration Threatens Legality of Faith Groups in Tajikistan
  • Swiss Ban on Minarets Raises Concerns
  • Uzbek Authorities Crack Down on Religious Activities

Newsletter Subscriber

Thanks for subscribing
Name:
Email:
© 2009 The Institute for Global Engagement
  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Login
  • Contact Us